git.alexw.nyc home about git garden 
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
   10
   11
   12
   13
   14
   15
   16
   17
   18
   19
   20
   21
   22
   23
   24
   25
   26
   27
   28
   29
   30
   31
   32
   33
   34
   35
   36
   37
   38
   39
   40
   41
   42
   43
   44
   45
   46
   47
   48
   49
   50
   51
   52
   53
   54
   55
   56
   57
   58
   59
   60
   61
   62
   63
   64
   65
   66
   67
   68
   69
   70
   71
   72
   73
   74
   75
   76
   77
   78
   79
   80
   81
   82
   83
   84
   85
   86
   87
   88
   89

<html>
  <head>
    <meta charset="utf-8">
    <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width">
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="../style.css">
    <link rel="icon" type="image/png" href="../icon.png">
    <title>alexw.nyc</title>
  </head>
<body>
  <header>
    <table><tr><td><a href="../index.html"><img src="../icon.png" width=20 /></a></td>
			<td>alexw.nyc</td>
			<td><a href="../index.html">home</a></td>
			<td><a href="../about.html">about</a></td>
			<td><a href="//git.alexw.nyc">git</a></td>
			<td><a href="../garden.html">garden</a></td>
		</tr></table>
  </header>
<main>
<head>
    <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width">
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="../style.css">
	<title>alexw.nyc: heating people, not spaces</title>
</head>
<h3>Heating People, Not Spaces &mdash; Low-Tech Magazine</h3>
<p><a href="https://solar.lowtechmagazine.com/">Low Tech Magazine</a> describes
itself as "an online platform refusing to assume that every problem has a
high-tech solution [...] underscor[ing] the potential of past and often
forgotten technologies and how they can inform sustainable energy practices."
The magazine challenges the notion that technology develops in a
progressive manner, or that new technology is necessarily better. Rather, it argues, the forces that shape technological adoption often have
less to do with improving something or solving a problem, but rather, meeting the
needs of companies to sell new, bigger, and more complex products. These companies must follow the unceasing demands of capital to expand, develop new markets, and increase
consumption. Their technologies, while new, have little to do with meeting
human needs, and more to do with creating desires and cultural norms for an expensive
product, regardless of the damage that it does to its users or to the world.</p>

<p>These structural forces leave abandoned a large area of unexplored technology: technologies that may have been useful but did not survive as market commodities, and were replaced and outmoded, despite having perhaps surprisingly positive traits.  While praising
mechanical windmills or typewriters may seem somewhat
goofy, the magazine encourages the reader to see how our objection to "low"
technology is often based not on reason, but on cultural norms and an ideological attachment to 
an abstract notion of "technological progress," defined as greater complexity
and higher levels of production and consumption.
</p>

<p><em>Heating People, Not Spaces</em> is one of several vanity-published
book-length collections of articles from Low Tech Magazine's <a
href="https://solar.lowtechmagazine.com/2023/12/thematic-book-series-heating-people-not-spaces/">solar-powered
website</a>. It discusses indoor temperature regulation and argues, broadly, that our standard
approach of temperature regulation via thermostats and central heating is backwards and enormously
wasteful. Rather, we should look to alternative technologies that focus on heating people, not spaces,
including tile stoves, thermal clothing, and, their favorite "low"
technology: the hot water bottle. This is an archetypical "Low Tech
Magazine" technology: simple, obvious, extremely effective, overlooked, and a bit
eccentric. Hot water bottles are a low-tech solution to keeping the body warm:
just get a couple water bottles, fill them with hot water, and keep them close to your body.  </p>
<p>The energy one saves from using hot water bottles rather than warming an entire
room (or warming a room far less) is so staggering that the strangeness of this idea is
turned on its head &mdash; isn't it actually far more bizarre  
that we insist on a large amount of wasteful and complex infrastructure to heat
an entire room, rather than just our bodies? And the advantages are more than just
saving energy: when focusing on heating people over spaces, each individual can choose
their own ideal temperature. The only barrier is the abnormalcy of the
practice.</p>

<p>The reasons that "low" technologies are abandoned or overlooked often has little to do
with a better technology coming along, but rather with social forces such
as marketing or changing norms. The magazine discusses the concept of "comfort
standards," an apparently regulated and standardized set of guidelines that inform 
building codes, and which are apparently heavily influenced by ASHRAE, a
business organization representing the American heating and cooling industry.
Our desires and expectations around indoor heating and cooling thus can be thought of less as
a matter of personal taste or consumer choice, and more one of generated demand
created by an industry's lobbying.</p>

<p>Low Tech Magazine's vision is not about
austerity or Luddism. Rather, while we may associate large rooms with efficient central heating with wealth and luxury, whereas keeping a hot water bottle on your
person seems goofy and ascetic, careful consideration reveals that this is merely a cultural association (created by an industry with economic interests) that often has
nothing to do with the objective characteristics of the technology itself.</p>

<p>For a highlight from this book, check out <a href="https://solar.lowtechmagazine.com/2022/01/the-revenge-of-the-hot-water-bottle/">The Revenge of the Hot Water Bottle</a>.</p>
</main>
<footer>
<a href="/tech/infra.html">live</a> from beautiful brooklyn, new york
<a href="mailto:alex@alexwennerberg.com">email</a>
<a href="https://merveilles.town/@aw">mastodon</a>
</footer>
</body>
</html>